This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Although the assessment of death has long been accepted as the physician's domain, death as a concept is shared with several stakeholders, including religion, philosophy, and society as a whole. This is not to say that the physician is not part of the conceptual understanding of death, but rather that the physician cannot claim sole ownership of defining death. This claim is illustrated by the fact that the well-known Harvard criteria were written by clinicians,1 but writers of the Uniform Determination of Death Act and planned revisions will include policymakers, theologians, physicians, and attorneys.2 Furthermore, a search of the ethics literature features a robust dialog on the topic, including many pieces written by nonclinicians. Consequently, a complete understanding of the dialog around determination by neurologic criteria requires knowing both a clinician's perspective and that of a theologian, a philosopher, and a member of the general public. While the companion piece written by Nathaniel Robbins focused on the clinician's perspective of criteria for neurologic determination, this piece will examine the criterion from the lens of those who are not clinicians. I will defer the larger question if any neurologic criteria can garner consensus for death equivalency and instead focus on which neurologic criteria would be most widely supported.
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Editor-in-Chief José Merino, MD, MPhil, FAAN.
See page 83
- Received November 7, 2022.
- Accepted in final form March 15, 2023.
- © 2023 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
