This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
We assessed eyelid function by subjective clinical examination and quantitative means in patients recovering from facial nerve palsy.Electromagnetic search coil techniques were used to record the concurrent movements of the two eyelids to study alterations in blink main sequence (peak velocity versus amplitude) relationships and interocular differences in eyelid kinematics. After onset of unilateral palsy, the paresis of eyelid closure showed varying degrees of recovery. Adaptive increases in blink main sequence slope contributed to maximizing closure of the paretic eyelid. However, blink adaptation mechanisms must operate bilaterally, as there also was evidence of altered main sequence slope in the nonparetic eyelid. In general, main sequence slope was inversely related to the level of eyelid paresis. The highest indices of blink adaptation were in those patients with moderate paresis, and main sequence slope was decreased in those patients with increasing degrees of recovery. The assessment of eyelid function with search coil techniques provides a sensitive means of monitoring disease and treatment course. Data also aid understanding of adaptive gain control in the neural control of blink in health and disease.
NEUROLOGY 1996;46: 1079-1085
- Copyright 1996 by Advanstar Communications Inc.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
