This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
In this study, we evaluated the effect of imprecision in patient repositioning encountered in real life on multiple sclerosis (MS) lesion volumes measured from MRIs. We also evaluated two putative methods for reducing the variability in these lesion volume measurements: first, a reduction of slice thickness (from the conventional 5 mm to 3 mm) and second, the application of a new repositioning technique based on the use of head immobilization shells. We evaluated the errors in lesion volume by scanning 10 patients a total of four times using the two slice thicknesses and two repositioning methods (conventional and using a head immobilization shell). The mean absolute percentage difference between two corresponding scans was 6.8% (range, 1.24 to 11%) using conventional slice thickness and repositioning, 4.1% (range, 0.7 to 5.56%) using conventional slice thickness and head immobilization shells, 2.6% (range, 0.8 to 6.66%) using the conventional repositioning technique and 3-mm slice thickness, and 1.4%(range, 0.2 to 6.14%) using slice thickness of 3 mm and head immobilization shells. These mean absolute differences were significantly different(p = 0.0008). Our results indicate that the effect of repositioning errors of the order of those that can be encountered in the daily life situation of clinical trials affects significantly lesion load measurements in MS and that the combined use of thinner slices and more accurate repositioning techniques can markedly improve the reproducibility of such measurements.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Alert Me
Recommended articles
Accumulation of hypointense lesions ("black holes") on T1 spin-echo MRI correlates with disease progression in multiple sclerosis
Interscanner variation in brain MRI lesion load measurements in MS: Implications for clinical trials
Ventricular enlargement in MS
Magnetization transfer imaging to monitor the evolution of MS