This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
To clarify the appropriate role of lumboperitoneal (LP) shunting in the surgical management of pseudotumor cerebri (PTC), we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data from 30 patients who underwent this procedure. We found LP shunting to be an effective means of acutely lowering intracranial pressure. Symptoms of increased intracranial pressure improved in 82% of patients. Among 14 eyes with impaired visual acuity, 10 (71%) improved by at least two lines. Worsening of vision occurred in only one eye. Of 28 eyes with abnormal Goldmann perimetry, 18 (64%) improved and none worsened. The incidence of serious complications was low. The major drawback of LP shunting was the need for frequent revisions in a few patients. The reason for poor shunt tolerance in certain individuals is unclear. In PTC, LP shunting should be considered as the first surgical procedure for patients with severe visual loss at presentation or with intractable headache (with or without visual loss). After shunting it is important to identify patients who are shunt intolerant.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
