This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
The role of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) as an independent confirmation test in presurgical evaluation of medically intractable temporal lobe epilepsy has not been critically investigated. Because spreading ictal discharges may cause a concomitant increase of cerebral blood flow in remote cerebral regions, a careful analysis of peri-injection EEG patterns and their relation to ictal SPECT may be important in evaluating the reliability of ictal SPECT. Both interictal and ictal EEG and SPECT were reviewed in 19 patients with temporal lobe epilepsy who achieved a successful seizure outcome after surgery. Patients were divided into unitemporal and bitemporal groups according to the lateralization of interictal epileptiform discharges (IED). Ictal EEG features were classified into lateralized and nonlateralized groups. The concordance between SPECT and EEG lateralizations was examined in each patient and correlated to the documented epileptogenic temporal lobe. Interictal SPECT correctly lateralized in eight of nine patients with unitemporal IED and in five of 10 patients with bitemporal IED. Ictal SPECT was highly concordant with the peri-injection ictal EEG but correctly lateralized the epileptogenic region in only 11 of 19 patients. When both pre- and postinjection EEG epochs lateralized ipsilaterally, all ictal SPECT images showed concordant lateralization. If pre- and postinjection EEG epochs were either different in lateralization or nonlateralization, ictal SPECT images often showed complex patterns of cerebral perfusion with a high incidence of false lateralization. Interictal SPECT was more sensitive and reliable in patients with unitemporal IED than in patients with bitemporal IEDs. Ictal SPECT was closely related with peri-injection EEG epochs but with frequent false lateralization. The role of ictal SPECT as an independent confirmation test in presurgical evaluation should be reappraised.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
