This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background: The identification of lacunar infarcts before thrombolysis would make it possible either to exclude them from treatment or to show that they also may benefit from it.
Objective: To determine whether clinical presentation or early CT findings of patients enrolled in the first European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS I) trial would identify lacunar infarcts before treatment.
Methods: Predictive values, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of clinical presentation as pure motor hemiparesis (PMH) or sensorimotor stroke (SMS) syndromes and of baseline CT findings in predicting lacunar infarcts were calculated in the ECASS I patients.
Results: Of 514 patients, 44 placebo (17%) and 44 recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) (18%) patients had PMH/SMS involving at least two of three areas. Thirty-one placebo (12%) and 32 rt-PA (13%) patients had PMH/SMS involving three areas. The 7-day CT was compatible with a lacunar infarct in 32 placebo (12%) and 44 rt-PA (18%) patients. PMH/SMS involving at least two areas had a positive predictive value of 30% both in placebo and rt-PA patients, whereas positive predictive values of the involvement of three areas were 23% and 31%. Those of absence of early CT signs were 21% and 30%, and those of leukoaraiosis or previous lacunar infarcts were 21% and 23%. Positive predictive values of PMH/SMS involving at least two areas combined with absence of early CT signs were 36% in placebo and 33% in t-PA patients, and those of PMH/SMS plus leukoaraiosis or previous lacunes were 28% and 7%, respectively.
Conclusions: In the ECASS I trial, lacunar infarcts were not recognizable on clinical grounds, and early CT findings, alone or in combination with the clinical picture, added poorly to the differential diagnosis.
- Received February 4, 1999.
- Accepted September 6, 1999.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
