This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the ability of measures of initial severity, tests of attention, and demographic characteristics to predict recovery of continuous memory for words over a 24-hour period in patients with acute traumatic brain injury.
Methods: Recovery of continuous memory was assessed prospectively in 94 patients with nonpenetrating traumatic brain injury. A classification and regression tree analysis identified a hierarchical subset of variables that may be used as a simple guideline for predicting recovery of continuous memory. Weibull regression models evaluated and compared the predictive ability of multiple variables.
Results: Four groups of patients were identified based on measures of severity of injury and demographic characteristics. These four groups had recovery profiles that were more precise than could be obtained by using the Glasgow Coma Scale alone: mild, about 1 week to recovery of continuous memory; moderate, 1 to 4 weeks; severe, 2 to 6 weeks; and extremely severe, 4 to 8 weeks. Regression analysis confirmed that measures of capacity (inherent resources such as indicated by age) and compromise (general functional brain state measured neuropsychologically) improved prediction over models based only on injury severity measures, such as the Glasgow Coma Scale.
Conclusions: Approaches to predicting recovery of continuous memory in the acute period after traumatic brain injury that take into account multiple measures provide a more sensitive predictive index.
- Received July 14, 1999.
- Accepted December 3, 1999.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Hastening the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Dr. Brian Callaghan and Dr. Kellen Quigg