This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background: The severity of postoperative memory decline in unilateral temporal lobectomy patients has been associated both with the extent of hippocampal resection and MRI measures of preoperative hippocampal volume. Serial MRI of the hippocampal remnant suggest that further volume loss occurs in the immediate postoperative period. For the majority of patients, this process appears to stabilize within the first 3 months. The authors examined the relationship between the dynamic volume of the hippocampal remnant and postoperative memory decline.
Method: Seventeen adult temporal lobectomy patients (nine, left; eight, right) underwent a full neuropsychological assessment and a volumetric MRI scan preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Examination of the posterior hippocampal remnant on the postoperative scan revealed volume loss in this segment compared to the identical segment preoperatively in 16 of 17 cases. Spearman’s correlations were used to examine the relationship between postoperative memory decline (postoperative − preoperative memory scores) and the postoperative/preoperative hippocampal remnant volume ratio.
Results: The volume of the hippocampal remnant left in situ was significantly correlated with postoperative memory change. Patients with smaller remnant volumes demonstrated more postoperative memory decline than those with larger remnants. In addition, extensive hippocampal remnant shrinkage was associated with postoperative memory decline in both the right and left temporal lobectomy groups.
Conclusions: The absolute volume and subsequent volume loss in the hippocampal remnant following surgery can influence postoperative memory change. These findings suggest that postoperative processes should be considered in addition to preoperative pathology and surgical factors in the prediction of postoperative memory change.
- Received January 18, 2000.
- Accepted in final form April 6, 2000.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Differences in Age-related Retinal and Cortical Atrophy Rates in Multiple Sclerosis
Prof. Massimo Filippi and Dr. Paolo Preziosa