This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and MR perfusion imaging (MRPI) as tools for identifying regions of infarct and hypoperfusion associated with aphasia and neglect in hyperacute stroke. Secondary goal: to establish a functional correlate of a radiologically defined “ischemic penumbra.”
Methods: Forty subjects underwent DWI, MRPI, and standardized tests for lexical deficits or hemispatial neglect within 24 hours of stroke onset or progression. Ten patients had repeat DWI, MRPI, and cognitive testing after 3 days (in some cases after reperfusion therapy). Pearson correlations between error rate on cognitive testing and volume of abnormality on DWI versus MRPI were determined at each time period, and regions of hypoperfusion corresponding to specific cognitive deficits were identified.
Results: Error rate was more strongly correlated with volume of hypoperfused tissue on MRPI (r = 0.65 to 0.93; p < 0.01 to p < 0.0003) than with volume of lesion on DWI (r = 0.54 to 0.75; p = 0.14 to p < 0.01) for dominant and nondominant hemisphere stroke, at each time point. Forty-eight percent of aphasic patients and 67% of those with hemispatial neglect had either no infarct or only small subcortical infarct on DWI, but had focal cortical hypoperfusion. Patients who had successful reperfusion therapy showed resolution of the hypoperfused territory beyond the infarction on repeat MRPI and showed resolution of corresponding deficits.
Conclusions: MRPI shows regions of hypoperfused cortex associated with lexical deficits or hemispatial neglect, even when DWI shows no infarct or only small subcortical infarct. MRPI–DWI mismatch indicates regions of functionally salvageable tissue.
- Received February 21, 2000.
- Accepted in final form June 5, 2000.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
