This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background: Patients with mild to moderate AD often are apathetic and fail to attend to novel aspects of their environment.
Objective: To investigate the mechanisms underlying these changes by studying the novelty P3 response that measures shifts of attention toward novel events.
Methods: While event-related potentials were recorded, mildly impaired AD patients and matched normal controls (NC) viewed line drawings that included a repetitive background stimulus, an infrequent target stimulus, and infrequent novel stimuli. Subjects controlled how long they viewed each stimulus by pressing a button. This served as a measure of their allocation of attention. They also responded to targets by depressing a foot pedal. Patients did not differ from NC in age, education, estimated IQ, or mood but were judged by informants to be more apathetic.
Results: P3 amplitude to novel stimuli was significantly smaller for AD patients than NC. However, P3 amplitude to target stimuli did not differ between groups. For NC, P3 response to novel stimuli was much larger than to background stimuli. In contrast, for patients with AD, there was no difference in P3 response to novel vs background stimuli. Although NC spent more time looking at novel than background stimuli, patients with AD distributed their viewing time evenly. Remarkably, for patients with AD, the amplitude of the novelty P3 response powerfully predicted how long they would spend looking at novel stimuli (R2 = 0.52) and inversely correlated with apathy severity.
Conclusions: The decreased attention to novel events exhibited by patients with AD cannot be explained by a nonspecific reduction in their attentional abilities. The novelty P3 response is markedly diminished in mild AD, at a time when the target P3 response is preserved. The disruption of the novelty P3 response predicts diminished attention to novel stimuli and is associated with the apathy exhibited by patients with AD.
- Received August 22, 2000.
- Accepted January 30, 2001.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
