This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Introduction: The MS Functional Composite (MSFC), a recently developed outcome measure for MS clinical trials measuring three dimensions (ambulation/leg function, arm/hand function, and cognition), was applied to 134 patients with MS to study the concurrent validity, using MRI measurements as a biological disease marker. The results were compared to correlations between the traditionally applied Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and MRI measurements in the same patients.
Methods: The assessments of MSFC and EDSS were performed in combination with brain MRI. MRI consisted of T1- and T2-weighted images, from which the hypointense and hyperintense lesion loads were quantified.
Results: The MSFC score ranged from −2.54 to 0.99. The median EDSS was 3.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 1.5 to 6.0). The median T2-weighted lesion load was 8.4 cm3 (IQR 3.4 to 19.8) and the median T1-weighted lesion load was 1.1 cm3 (IQR 0.3 to 3.2). Correlations between the MSFC and both T1 (−0.24) and T2 (−0.25) lesion loads were demonstrated, but not between the EDSS and both MRI parameters. Significant correlations between MSFC components and T1 and T2 lesion loads existed for cognitive function and arm/hand function, but not for ambulation. If relapse-onset patients (relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive) were combined, the correlation between MSFC and MRI parameters became stronger for both T1 (−0.37) and T2 lesion loads (−0.35).
Conclusions: The authors present the concurrent validity of the MSFC with a biological disease marker by showing correlations with MRI. Specifically, they demonstrate significant correlations with cognition and arm/hand function assessments, domains that are not well represented in the EDSS.
- Received May 12, 2000.
- Accepted September 22, 2000.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
