This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background: In polyneuropathy associated with immunoglobulin M (IgM) monoclonal gammopathy, antibodies to myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG), sulfoglucuronyl paragloboside (SGPG), and sulfatide have been associated with specific clinical and electrophysiologic features. However, it is not known whether the results of antibody tests provide additional information for the individual patient (and the neurologist) in terms of future neurologic deficit or outcome.
Objective: To study the independent contribution of potential prognostic factors to the prediction of outcome of neuropathy associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy.
Methods: In accordance with the chronology in which prognostic factors are available in clinical practice, the association between prognostic factors and outcome was evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis in 65 patients with polyneuropathy and IgM monoclonal gammopathy.
Results: In univariate analysis, the initial symptoms, the IgM light chain type, electrophysiologic and pathologic studies, the presence of sural nerve IgM deposition, and anti-MAG or anti-SGPG antibodies were significantly associated with outcome. However, multivariate analysis showed that only initial symptoms and electrophysiologic studies are independent prognostic factors: initial sensory symptoms of the feet are prognostic for a slowly progressive disease course and less disability at 4 years, and evidence for demyelination on electrophysiologic examination is prognostic for development of weakness and symptoms of the upper extremities at 4 years. Addition of anti-MAG or anti-SGPG antibody tests did not yield any additional prediction of outcome.
Conclusion: These results indicate that in clinical practice, antibody tests in polyneuropathy associated with IgM monoclonal gammopathy do not have a prognostic value in terms of future neurologic deficit or outcome.
- Received April 7, 2000.
- Accepted October 4, 2000.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
