This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze, in patients with unilateral regional epilepsy, the influence of intracarotid amobarbital injection order on the level of recognition memory, with both injections performed within approximately half an hour, when the order was varied by a first injection into either the epileptogenic or the nonepileptogenic hemisphere.
Methods: Of a series of 74 consecutive intracarotid amobarbital procedures (IAP), 61 valid bilateral tests were extracted for analysis. The protocol was changed from a congruent sequence (epileptogenic hemisphere injected first; n = 32) to an incongruent sequence (nonepileptogenic hemisphere injected first; n = 29). Memory was quantified by the percentage of presented items recognized before the recovery of full motor power (corrected for guessing).
Results: The congruent group showed a poorer recognition percentage after injection into the nonepileptogenic hemisphere than after injection into the epileptogenic hemisphere. The incongruent group had a similar recognition percentage after both injections. This was especially apparent in patients with a right epileptogenic hemisphere.
Conclusions: The commonly used congruent injection order leads to a poorer recognition by the epileptogenic hemisphere than the nonepileptogenic hemisphere. This relation cannot be found with an incongruent sequence. The results raise doubts about the internal validity of the IAP in describing isolated hemispheric memory functions.
- Received December 30, 2002.
- Accepted August 13, 2003.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
