Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Neurology: Clinical Practice Accelerator
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
    • UDDA Revision Series
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Neurology: Clinical Practice Accelerator
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
    • UDDA Revision Series
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

February 01, 2011; 76 (5) Articles

Consensus recommendations for MS cortical lesion scoring using double inversion recovery MRI

J.J.G. Geurts, S.D. Roosendaal, M. Calabrese, O. Ciccarelli, F. Agosta, D.T. Chard, A. Gass, E. Huerga, B. Moraal, D. Pareto, M.A. Rocca, M.P. Wattjes, T.A. Yousry, B.M.J. Uitdehaag, F. Barkhof
First published January 5, 2011, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31820a0cc4
J.J.G. Geurts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.D. Roosendaal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Calabrese
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
O. Ciccarelli
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Agosta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.T. Chard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Gass
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Huerga
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Moraal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Pareto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.A. Rocca
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.P. Wattjes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T.A. Yousry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B.M.J. Uitdehaag
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Barkhof
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
Consensus recommendations for MS cortical lesion scoring using double inversion recovery MRI
J.J.G. Geurts, S.D. Roosendaal, M. Calabrese, O. Ciccarelli, F. Agosta, D.T. Chard, A. Gass, E. Huerga, B. Moraal, D. Pareto, M.A. Rocca, M.P. Wattjes, T.A. Yousry, B.M.J. Uitdehaag, F. Barkhof
Neurology Feb 2011, 76 (5) 418-424; DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31820a0cc4

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
933

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Abstract

Background: Different double inversion recovery (DIR) sequences are currently used in multiple sclerosis (MS) research centers to visualize cortical lesions, making it difficult to compare published data. This study aimed to formulate consensus recommendations for scoring cortical lesions in patients with MS, using DIR images acquired in 6 European centers according to local protocols.

Methods: Consensus recommendations were formulated and tested in a multinational meeting.

Results: Cortical lesions were defined as focal abnormalities on DIR, hyperintense compared to adjacent normal-appearing gray matter, and were not scored unless ≥3 pixels in size, based on at least 1.0 mm2 in-plane resolution. Besides these 2 obligatory criteria, additional, supportive recommendations concerned a priori artifact definition on DIR, use of additional MRI contrasts to verify suspected lesions, and a constant level of displayed image contrast. Robustness of the recommendations was tested in a small dataset of available, heterogeneous DIR images, provided by the different participating centers. An overall moderate agreement was reached when using the proposed recommendations: more than half of the readers agreed on slightly more than half (54%) of the cortical lesions scored, whereas complete agreement was reached in 19.4% of the lesions (usually larger, mixed white matter/gray matter lesions).

Conclusions: Although not designed as a formal interobserver study, the current study suggests that comparing available literature data on cortical lesions may be problematic, and increased consistency in acquisition protocols may improve scoring agreement. Sensitivity and specificity of the proposed recommendations should now be studied in a more formal, prospective, multicenter setting using similar DIR protocols.

Footnotes

  • Study funding: The MS Center Amsterdam is supported by the Dutch MS Research Foundation (05-358c). The NMR Research Unit of the Department of Neuroinflammation is supported by the MS Society Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and Department of Health's NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre at UCLH.

  • DIR
    double inversion recovery
    EDSS
    Expanded Disability Status Scale
    GM
    gray matter
    MS
    multiple sclerosis
    WM
    white matter.

  • Editorial, page 412

  • Received May 18, 2010.
  • Accepted August 30, 2010.
  • Copyright © 2011 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.
View Full Text

AAN Members

We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.

Google Safari Microsoft Edge Firefox

Click here to login

AAN Non-Member Subscribers

Click here to login

Purchase access

For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)

Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here 

Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page.  Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00.  Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means.  The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use.  Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
    • COINVESTIGATORS
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Association of Amount of Weight Lost After Bariatric Surgery With Intracranial Pressure in Women With Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

Dr. Deborah Friedman and Dr. Stacy Smith

► Watch

Related Articles

  • MS cortical lesion or not?Double inversion recovery MRI reveals some answers and uncertainties

Topics Discussed

  • All Clinical Neurology
  • All Demyelinating disease (CNS)
  • Multiple sclerosis
  • MRI
  • Memory

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published

Recommended articles

  • Articles
    Postmortem verification of MS cortical lesion detection with 3D DIR
    A. Seewann, E.-J. Kooi, S.D. Roosendaal et al.
    Neurology, January 04, 2012
  • Articles
    Distinct lesion morphology at 7-T MRI differentiates neuromyelitis optica from multiple sclerosis
    Tim Sinnecker, Jan Dörr, Caspar F. Pfueller et al.
    Neurology, August 01, 2012
  • Editorials
    MS cortical lesions on double inversion recovery MRI
    Few but true
    Olga Ciccarelli, Jacqueline T. Chen et al.
    Neurology, January 04, 2012
  • Editorials
    MS cortical lesion or not?
    Double inversion recovery MRI reveals some answers and uncertainties
    Jacqueline T. Chen, Istvan Pirko et al.
    Neurology, January 05, 2011
Neurology: 101 (7)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Education
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2023 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise