This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: We retrospectively examined treatment records of developmentally disabled adults with highly refractory epilepsy to determine whether any combinations of 8 of the most commonly used antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) possessed superior efficacy.
Methods: We obtained the treatment records from 148 developmentally disabled adults with refractory epilepsy cared for in 2 state-run institutions. These records charted monthly convulsive seizure occurrence and AED regimen over 30 years. We studied the effects of 8 commonly used AEDs alone and in combination on seizure frequency in within-patient comparisons.
Results: Out of the 32 most frequently used AED combinations, we found that only the combination of lamotrigine and valproate had superior efficacy, measured against both an aggregate measure of other AED regimens to which patients were exposed, and in head-to-head comparisons with other AED combinations. We also found that while use of 2 concurrent AEDs provided improved efficacy over monotherapy, use of 3 AEDs at a time provided no further benefit over two.
Conclusions: These results suggest that at least one AED regimen provides significantly better efficacy in refractory convulsive epilepsy, and that AEDs should be used no more than 2 at a time. Limitations of the study include its retrospective design, lack of randomization, and small sample sizes for some drug combinations. Future prospective trials are needed in this challenging clinical population.
GLOSSARY
- AED=
- antiepileptic drug;
- CBZ=
- carbamazepine;
- CI=
- confidence interval;
- DD=
- developmentally disabled;
- LTG=
- lamotrigine;
- OXC=
- oxcarbazepine;
- PB=
- phenobarbital;
- PHT=
- phenytoin;
- SFR=
- seizure frequency ratio;
- TPM=
- topiramate;
- VPA=
- valproate;
- ZNS=
- zonisamide
Footnotes
Study funding: Supported by the University of Washington Royalty Research Fund (N.P.P.).
-
Supplemental data at www.neurology.org
- Received May 18, 2011.
- Accepted August 26, 2011.
- Copyright © 2012 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
