Three-tesla functional MR language mapping
Comparison with direct cortical stimulation in gliomas
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of functional MRI (fMRI) at 3T, as currently used in the preoperative mapping of language areas, compared with direct cortical stimulation (DCS) during awake surgery, in patients with supratentorial gliomas; and to identify clinical, histopathologic, and radiologic factors associated with fMRI/DCS discrepancies.
Methods: Language mapping with fMRI and DCS of 40 consecutive patients with gliomas (24 low-grade, 16 high-grade) in functional areas were retrospectively analyzed. Three block-designed tasks were performed during fMRI (letter word generation, category word generation, semantic association). During awake surgery, eloquent areas were mapped using DCS, blinded to fMRI. A site-by-site comparison of the 2 techniques was performed using a cortical grid. fMRI sensitivity and specificity were calculated using DCS as the reference. Associations of clinical, histopathologic, and radiologic features (including relative cerebral blood volume [rCBV] measured with dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI) with fMRI false-positive and false-negative occurrence were assessed using hierarchical logistic regressions.
Results: Of 2,114 stimulated cortical sites, 103 were positive for language during DCS. Sensitivity and specificity of language fMRI combining the 3 tasks reached 37.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 20.7–57.2) and 83.4% (95% CI 77.1–88.3), respectively. Astrocytoma subtype (odds ratio [OR] 2.50 [1.32–4.76]; p = 0.007), tumor rCBV <1.5 (OR 2.17 [1.08–4.35]; p = 0.03), higher cortical rCBV (OR 2.22 [1.15–4.17]; p = 0.02), and distance to tumor >1 cm (OR 2.46 [1.82–3.32]; p ≤ 0.001) were independently associated with fMRI false-positive occurrence.
Conclusions: There are pitfalls in preoperative fMRI as currently used in preoperative language mapping in glioma patients, made more complicated when high-grade and hyperperfused tumors are evaluated.
GLOSSARY
- BOLD=
- blood oxygenation level–dependent;
- CBV=
- cerebral blood volume;
- DCS=
- direct cortical stimulation;
- FLAIR=
- fluid-attenuated inversion recovery;
- fMRI=
- functional MRI;
- IQR=
- interquartile range;
- rCBV=
- relative cerebral blood volume;
- ROI=
- region of interest
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Editorial, page 550
Supplemental data at Neurology.org
- Received March 31, 2014.
- Accepted in final form August 28, 2014.
- © 2015 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
More Online
Dr. Fabricio Ferreira de Oliveira and Dr. Alan Cronemberger Andrade
► Watch
Related Articles
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Articles
EEG-fMRIAdding to standard evaluations of patients with nonlesional frontal lobe epilepsyF. Moeller, L. Tyvaert, D. K. Nguyen et al.Neurology, December 07, 2009 -
Articles
Cortical/subcortical BOLD changes associated with epileptic dischargesAn EEG-fMRI study at 3 TPaolo Federico, John S. Archer, David F. Abbott et al.Neurology, April 11, 2005 -
Articles
The core network in absence epilepsyDifferences in cortical and thalamic BOLD responseP.W. Carney, R.A.J. Masterton, A.S. Harvey et al.Neurology, August 11, 2010 -
Articles
The frontal lobe in absence epilepsyEEG-fMRI findingsP.W. Carney, R.A.J. Masterton, D. Flanagan et al.Neurology, March 28, 2012


