This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives MRI and PET imaging enables subgroups of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) to be defined on the basis of structural pathology. Few studies have examined the variation in electroclinical seizure spread patterns based on imaging findings. We performed a retrospective cohort study to investigate the electroclinical differences among 3 specific groups of TLE: MRI-negative PET-positive TLE (MRI-negative TLE), temporal lobe lesion TLE (lesional TLE), and unilateral hippocampal sclerosis TLE (HS-TLE).
Methods Patients with an electroclinical diagnosis of TLE who had video-scalp EEG recordings of seizures were identified from the retrospective database of the Austin Comprehensive Epilepsy Program between 2005 and 2019. The cohort was further selected into the 3 defined groups based on imaging findings, using MRI and FDG-PET. Timings of clinical and electrographic seizure progression were measured, considering the onset, ipsilateral lobar spread, contralateral spread, and termination. Durations were compared between groups using linear mixed models with inclusion of demographic and clinical covariates.
Results A total of 105 patients (137 seizures) were included, comprising 36 with MRI-negative TLE (54 seizures), 36 with lesional TLE (18 lateral vs 16 mesial lesions; 44 seizures), and 33 with HS-TLE (39 seizures). Seizure duration was similar between MRI-negative TLE and lesional TLE (mean 75.9 vs 71.7 seconds; p = 0.91). Further dividing lesional TLE into medial vs lateral temporal revealed no timing difference. However, the HS-TLE group had longer total seizure duration (114 seconds) compared with both MRI-negative TLE (p < 0.001) and lesional TLE (p < 0.001). Progression of electrographic spread also reflected this pattern, with involvement of extratemporal regions and then the contralateral hemisphere each taking significantly longer in HS-TLE.
Discussion MRI-negative TLE appears electrographically similar to lesional TLE, whether mesial or lateral, in the duration of seizures and the timing of electrographic spread. Both appear electrographically different from HS-TLE, where propagation is slower, suggesting engagement of different epileptogenic networks or seizure suppression mechanisms.
Classification of Evidence This study provides Class II evidence that the electroclinical features of seizures in HS-TLE are different than MRI-negative TLE and lesional TLE.
Glossary
- ASM=
- antiseizure medication;
- FDG=
- fluorodeoxyglucose;
- HS=
- hippocampal sclerosis;
- TLE=
- temporal lobe epilepsy
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Barbara Jobst, MD, PhD.
Class of Evidence: NPub.org/coe
- Received August 21, 2021.
- Accepted in final form February 21, 2022.
- © 2022 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
