This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives Studies on tumefactive brain lesions in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-immunoglobulin G (IgG)–associated disease (MOGAD) are lacking. We sought to characterize the frequency clinical, laboratory, and MRI features of these lesions in MOGAD and compare them with those in multiple sclerosis (MS) and aquaporin-4-IgG–positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4+NMOSD).
Methods We retrospectively searched 194 patients with MOGAD and 359 patients with AQP4+NMOSD with clinical/MRI details available from the Mayo Clinic databases and included those with ≥1 tumefactive brain lesion (maximum transverse diameter ≥2 cm) on MRI. Patients with tumefactive MS were identified using the Mayo Clinic medical record linkage system. Binary multivariable stepwise logistic regression identified independent predictors of MOGAD diagnosis; Cox proportional regression models were used to assess the risk of relapsing disease and gait aid in patients with tumefactive MOGAD vs those with nontumefactive MOGAD.
Results We included 108 patients with tumefactive demyelination (MOGAD = 43; AQP4+NMOSD = 16; and MS = 49). Tumefactive lesions were more frequent among those with MOGAD (43/194 [22%]) than among those with AQP4+NMOSD (16/359 [5%], p < 0.001). Risk of relapse and need for gait aid were similar in tumefactive and nontumefactive MOGAD. Clinical features more frequent in MOGAD than in MS included headache (18/43 [42%] vs 10/49 [20%]; p = 0.03) and somnolence (12/43 [28%] vs 2/49 [4%]; p = 0.003), the latter also more frequent than in AQP4+NMOSD (0/16 [0%]; p = 0.02). The presence of peripheral T2-hypointense rim, T1-hypointensity, diffusion restriction (particularly an arc pattern), ring enhancement, and Baló-like or cystic appearance favored MS over MOGAD (p ≤ 0.001). MRI features were broadly similar in MOGAD and AQP4+NMOSD, except for more frequent diffusion restriction in AQP4+NMOSD (10/15 [67%]) than in MOGAD (11/42 [26%], p = 0.005). CSF analysis revealed less frequent positive oligoclonal bands in MOGAD (2/37 [5%]) than in MS (30/43 [70%], p < 0.001) and higher median white cell count in MOGAD than in MS (33 vs 6 cells/μL, p < 0.001). At baseline, independent predictors of MOGAD diagnosis were the presence of somnolence/headache, absence of T2-hypointense rim, lack of T1-hypointensity, and no diffusion restriction (Nagelkerke R2 = 0.67). Tumefactive lesion resolution was more common in MOGAD than in MS or AQP4+NMOSD and improved model performance.
Discussion Tumefactive lesions are frequent in MOGAD but not associated with a worse prognosis. The clinical, MRI, and CSF attributes of tumefactive MOGAD differ from those of tumefactive MS and are more similar to those of tumefactive AQP4+NMOSD with the exception of lesion resolution, which favors MOGAD.
Glossary
- aHR=
- adjusted hazard ratio;
- AQP4+NMOSD=
- aquaporin-4-IgG–positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders;
- DWI=
- diffusion-weighted imaging;
- EDSS=
- Expanded Disability Status Scale;
- FLAIR=
- fluid-attenuated inversion recovery;
- IgG=
- immunoglobulin G;
- MOG=
- myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein;
- MOGAD=
- MOG-IgG–associated disease;
- MS=
- multiple sclerosis
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Deputy Editor Olga Ciccarelli, MD, PhD, FRCP.
- Received May 26, 2022.
- Accepted in final form December 2, 2022.
- © 2023 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
