安慰剂效应可以被定义为“改善条件的病人发生在对治疗的反应,但不能被认为是由于所使用的具体的治疗。”[2] Patients expecting an improvement in symptoms following the specific treatment of drug withdrawal may experience such an effect. It is scientifically appealing to conduct a double-blind controlled trial in which the "placebo" arm consists of patients continuing active pharmacological therapy while patients in the "active treatment" arm receive an inert substance.
我读这篇文章Zeeberg等[1]与兴趣,他们强调治疗的重要性断奶病人怀疑患有药物过度使用头痛(卫生部)。作者认为有可能观察到的改善头痛,部分是因为一个“逆”安慰剂效应?
安慰剂效应可以被定义为“改善条件的病人发生在对治疗的反应,但不能被认为是由于所使用的具体的治疗。”[2] Patients expecting an improvement in symptoms following the specific treatment of drug withdrawal may experience such an effect. It is scientifically appealing to conduct a double-blind controlled trial in which the "placebo" arm consists of patients continuing active pharmacological therapy while patients in the "active treatment" arm receive an inert substance.
虽然这无疑是理想的方式建立卫生部作为一种独特的临床实体,作者的务实方法提供了令人信服的证据指导管理这个问题的临床情况。
引用
1。Zeeberg, P。,J. Olesen, R. Jensen. Probable medication-overuse headache: the effect of a 2-month drug-free period. Neurology 2006;66:1894-1898.
2。Medline Plus韦伯斯特字典。http://www2.merriam-webster.com/cgi-bin/mwmednlm?book=Medical&va=placebo%20effect。2006年8月31日通过。
没有利益冲突的披露:作者报告。