首页TY - JOUR T1 - Implementation of the current dystonia classification from 2013 to 2017 (P4.8-013) JF - Neurology JO - Neurology VL - 92 IS - 15 Supplement SP - P4.8-013 AU - Alberto Albanese AU - Sanskriti Sasikumar AU - Joachim Krauss AU - Alfonso Fasano Y1 - 2019/04/09 UR - //www.ez-admanager.com/content/92/15_Supplement/P4.8-013.abstract N2 - Objective: To evaluate whether the studies published since the 2013 dystonia classification have adapted to the new terminology, and distinguish between the types of studies that are prone to error.Background: There is discrepancy in the way dystonia is classified in the literature as articles continue to reference the old criteria, or fail to use the 2013 criteria correctly.Design/Methods: We performed a systematic review of the dystonia literature and distinguished between studies that use the new classification correctly, made errors in implementing the new classification, or continued to use the old classification methods.Results: Of the 990 articles included in the study, 59.8% used the classification correctly, 31.3% used mixed terminology, and 8.9% continued to use the old classification.外科相关文章正确使用新分类的可能性要小得多(p<0.003)。文章年率正确使用新分类显示上升趋势。Albanese没有什么可透露的博士sasikumar没有什么可透露博士克拉乌斯没什么可透露博士Fasano因咨询、科学咨询委服务、讲演或Abbvie、Boston科学、Medtronic、Sunovion、Ipsen、UCH药店和Chiesi的其他活动而获得个人补偿博士Fasano因在Abbvie、Boston科学、Medtronic、Sunovion、Ipsen、UCH药厂和Chiesi董事会服务而获得补偿博士Fasano从Springer收到使用费、许可费或契约权支付博士Fasano从Abbie,Boston科学Medtronic获得研究支持ER-