Neuro-Interventionists TY - T1的共生关系:从并行实践跨学科病人护理(P05.002) JF -神经学乔-神经病学SP - P05.002 LP - P05.002六世- 80 - 7补充AU -托马斯·梁AU -安妮陈首页盟西蒙于黄盟-乔治王盟劳伦斯Y1 - 2013/02/12 UR - //www.ez-admanager.com/content/80/7_Supplement/P05.002.abstract N2 -目的:我们已经交付neuro-interventional服务通过放射学专家组成的团队为核心的方法,自2006年以来神经外科和神经学。我们旨在评估的影响和最优框架合作。背景:利基neuro-intervention变得错综复杂的神经学家进一步专攻neuro-endovascular程序。中心建立了血管内治疗的放射学家,神经外科医生,心脏病专家或血管外科医生,初露头角的介入神经学家可能在服务提供这些学科努力的伙伴。介入神经的作用,不同专业之间的合作的最佳框架尚不清楚。设计/方法:机构审查委员会批准了这项研究。我们评估这个协作模型的定量框架构造调查4个主要方面:哲学(相信interprofessional协作的好处,知道彼此的治疗方法),信任,过程(知识交流,医生向心性,冲突)和结果(工作满意度、个人成长,打算离开,研究输出)。医生、护士和摘录被邀请通过邮件来完成调查。单向方差分析测试或克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验被用于统计分析。结果:38团队成员(38/53,71.7%)完成了问卷调查。在连续平行实践综合模型,24反应(63.2%)定义当前多学科协作模式,综合或跨学科。 Majority of doctors (66.7%) and radiographers (62.5%) expressed a strong believe in benefits of interprofessional collaboration but only 28.6% nurses agreed. Doctors showed a stronger believe that the collaboration enable a better clinical outcome after endovascular intervention (p= 0.013). While most doctors enjoyed a high degree of autonomy and more opportunities for personal growth and research through the collaboration, most nurses and radiographers had less autonomy and described the collaboration as physician oriented (all p<0.05).CONCLUSIONS: A collaborative paradigm for neuro-interventional service may improve the clinical outcome of patients. However, the protocol-driven model may diminish autonomy and job satisfaction of nurses and radiographers.Supported by: S.H. Ho Foundation.Disclosure: Dr. Leung has nothing to disclose. Dr. Chan has nothing to disclose. Dr. Yu has nothing to disclose. Dr. Wong has nothing to disclose. Dr. Wong has nothing to disclose.Wednesday, March 20 2013, 2:00 pm-7:00 pm ER -