PT -期刊文章盟维姬夏克尔AU -约瑟夫·卡斯盟索尼娅Potrebic AU -马修·阿布拉莫维茨盟扎卡里·伦敦TI -临床技能考试培训项目(CSET):一个交互式训练对于评价者(P07.234) DP - 2012年4月26日TA -神经病学PG - P07.234 P07.234 VI - 78 IP - 1补充4099 - //www.ez-admanager.com/content/78/1_Supplement/P07.234.short 4100 - //www.ez-admanager.com/conte首页nt/78/1_Supplement/P07.234.full所以Neurology2012 4月26日;78 AB -目的:开发一个基于案例培训指导居民使用神经临床技能评估的评价(NEX)形式。背景美国精神病学和神经病学委员会)要求成人神经病学居民展示面试能力在医学和神经系统检查。首页ABPN-certified神经病学家必须执行这些评估。到目前为止,没有培训计划来指导评估和改善两分的可靠性。我们试图开发这样的程序。设计/方法:临床技能考试培训项目包括一个交互式审查的情况下,每个组成的一个临床装饰图案和一个假设的例子省略的部分居民。从50驾驶情况下,选择10分的基础上讨论。参与者提供ABPN的通过/失败的指导方针,这是基于能力的居民进行历史和考试提供了足够的信息来生成一个适当的鉴别诊断和治疗计划。使用一个现场观众的反应系统参与者投票。 Participants then discussed cases and voted again. Improvement was defined as a change in the passing rate in the desired direction for each case. A paired t test was used to compare the passing rate before and after the intervention for all items combined.Results: There were 108 participants from 5 sites. Participant characteristics were available from 4 of 5 sites: 83.5% were faculty, 16.5% were trainees. Of faculty participants, 64.3% were program directors. Nineteen participants (28.3%) had been ABPN examiners in the past. Improvement was noted for each item after the intervention, with rates ranging from 2.7% to 17.6%. The aggregate improvement for all items was 10.3% (95% confidence interval, 5.8-14.9%; p<0.001).Conclusions: In this pilot study, an interactive case review improved participant ability to rate in the desired direction. Expansion of this program is recommended for further assessment of validity.Disclosure: Dr. Shanker has received personal compensation for activities with Teva Neuroscience. Dr. Kass has nothing to disclose. Dr. Potrebic has nothing to disclose. Dr. Abramowitz has nothing to disclose. Dr. London has received personal compensation in an editorial capacity for Medlink Neurology.Dr. London has received (royalty or license fee or contractual rights) payments from The University of Michigan.Thursday, April 26 2012, 14:00 pm-18:30 pm