This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the clinical and laboratory features of primary progressive (PP) and secondary progressive (SP) MS, to evaluate the role of CSF and urine myelin basic protein-like material (MBPLM) in differentiating PP from SP MS, and to assess the utility of urine MBPLM as a surrogate marker of disease activity in progressive MS.
Background: The current categorization of subtypes of MS is based solely on clinical and temporal characteristics of the disease. Laboratory markers are needed that can differentiate reliably the subtypes of MS and serve as surrogate markers of disease progression.
Methods: Clinical and paraclinical data of 51 PPMS and 140 SPMS patients were reviewed retrospectively. CSF and urine MBPLM were measured using a double-antibody radioimmunoassay.
Results: PPMS was more likely to present with progressive myelopathy (p ≤ 0.001) after the age of 40 years (p = ≤0.001), and it affected men relatively more often than SPMS (male-to-female ratio, 1:1.7 versus 1:3.2 respectively). Ambulatory assistance was required by PP patients more often and earlier than in those with SPMS. The incidence of abnormal CSF, evoked potential, and cranial MRI studies was similar in the two groups. Spinal cord MRI abnormalities were noted significantly more often in SP disease. There was an insignificant trend of higher CSF MBPLM in SPMS compared with PPMS. Urine MBPLM and MBPLM/creatinine were significantly higher in SPMS than in PPMS. However, the values of urine MBPLM and MBPLM/creatinine at the initial visits of patients with PPMS and SPMS were not significantly different. Urine MBPLM/creatinine was significantly higher in both PPMS and SPMS compared with normal control subjects. No correlation was found between urine MBPLM and disease duration or between urine MBPLM and clinical disability. There was no correlation between urine MBPLM/creatinine and either disease duration or clinical disability.
Conclusions: These findings provide additional evidence of the differences in PPMS and SPMS, notably in the associated changes in MBPLM in urine, and also suggest a possible role for urine MBPLM in identifying patient cohorts. The high urine MBPLM levels in progressive MS patients indicate a potential role of this marker for assessing responsiveness to therapeutic interventions.
- Received September 28, 1998.
- Accepted in final form April 3, 1999.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
