There is nothing staid about STARD
Progress in the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article has a correction. Please see:

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Incomplete reporting hampers the evaluation of results and bias in randomized trials, systematic reviews, observational studies, and diagnostic accuracy studies. Guidelines for reporting study design and methods have been developed to encourage authors and journals to include the required elements, e.g., the CONSORT guidelines for reporting randomized controlled trials data,1 the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses,2 and the STROBE guidelines for reporting observational studies in epidemiology3,4.
Despite their importance in critical assessment of the literature, the impact of these guidelines has been disappointing. The original CONSORT guidelines came out in 1996.5 A direct comparison of pre-CONSORT reporting from 1994 to post-CONSORT reporting in 1998 demonstrated a small but significant improvement in reporting the CONSORT criteria6; however, by 2003, only 22% of high-impact medical journals referred to CONSORT in their instructions to authors and one-fourth of these referred to out-of-date criteria.7
The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) criteria were first reported in 2003.8,9 These guidelines for reporting the accuracy of diagnostic studies …
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Deborah Friedman and Dr. Stacy Smith
► Watch
Related Articles
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Articles
The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statementHas it improved?N. Smidt, A.W.S. Rutjes, D. A.W.M. van der Windt et al.Neurology, September 11, 2006 -
Views & Reviews
Reporting standards for studies of diagnostic test accuracy in dementiaThe STARDdem InitiativeAnna H. Noel-Storr, Jenny M. McCleery, Edo Richard et al.Neurology, June 18, 2014 -
Article
Diagnostic accuracy of intrathecal kappa free light chains compared with OCBs in MSFrida Duell, Björn Evertsson, Faiez Al Nimer et al.Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, June 11, 2020 -
Editorials
To test or not to test?That is the questionRobert G. Holloway, Thomas E. Feasby et al.Neurology, December 01, 1999


