This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the performance of nondemented subjects 85 years and older on the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD) neuropsychological battery, and to assess its relationship with sociodemographic variables.
Methods: We studied 196 subjects enrolled in an Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center study who had a complete CERAD neuropsychological assessment. We used multiple regression analysis to predict performance on the neuropsychological tests from age, education, and sex. Eight representative hypothetical individuals were created (for example, an 87-year-old man, with high education). For each test, estimates of performance at the 10th, 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles were reported for the eight representative hypothetical individuals.
Results: Mean age was 89.2 years (SD = 3.2), mean years of education was 14.9 (SD = 3.2), and 66% of the sample were women. For 11 of the 14 neuropsychological tests, there was a significant multiple regression model using education, age, and sex as predictors. Neither the models nor the predictors used individually were significant for Delayed Recall, Savings, or correct Recognition. Among the significant results, seven had education as the strongest predictor. Lower age and higher education were associated with better performance. Women performed better than men in three of four tests with significant results for sex.
Conclusions: In a sample of oldest old whose primary language is English, neuropsychological testing is influenced mainly by education and age. Cutoff scores based on younger populations and applied to the oldest old might lead to increased false-positive misclassifications.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
