This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Since the phrase “psychogenic nonepileptic seizures” has been the term of choice, it has become clear that the word “seizure” here creates confusion. Beyond theoretical arguments, the confusion it creates is detrimental to patients' and families' understanding of the diagnosis, which in turn has a negative impact on treatment.
Footnotes
-
See page 87
Editor's Note: The practicing neurologist often encounters nonepileptic events. Such patients present diagnostic and therapeutic challenges; here, in 2 essays by experts in the field, we focus on the diagnostic label and whether it matters what we call nonepileptic events that are psychogenic in origin.
Disclosure: Author disclosures are provided at the end of the article.
Received January 30, 2010. Accepted in final form March 19, 2010.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
- Psychogenic nonepileptic "seizures" or "attacks"?: It's not just semantics: Attacks
- Psychogenic nonepileptic "seizures" or "attacks"?: It's not just semantics: Attacks
- Psychogenic nonepileptic "seizures" or "attacks"?: It's not just semantics: Attacks
- Psychogenic nonepileptic "seizures" or "attacks"?: It's not just semantics: Attacks
- Psychogenic nonepileptic "seizures" or "attacks"?: It's not just semantics: Attacks
- Reply from the author
- Reply from the author
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Differences in Age-related Retinal and Cortical Atrophy Rates in Multiple Sclerosis
Prof. Massimo Filippi and Dr. Paolo Preziosa