This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To study the accuracy of the ABCD2 score in predicting early stroke risk following TIA and to model post-test probability of stroke for varying cutoff scores and baseline stroke risk.
Methods: Medline, PubMed, Embase, conference proceedings, and manuscript references up to October 2010 were searched for studies reporting ABCD2 score and stroke outcome after TIA. Additional data were requested from authors. Meta-analysis, meta-regression, and post-test probability modeling were undertaken to assess prediction of stroke at 2, 7, and 90 days.
Results: Of 44 eligible studies, data were available for 33 (16,070 patients): 26/33 reported stroke at 2 days (533 strokes), 32/33 at 7 days (781 strokes), and 28/33 at 90 days (1,028 strokes) after TIA. Using scores 0–3 (“low risk”) and 4–7 (“high risk”) for stroke at 7 days, pooled measures were sensitivity 0.89 (0.87–0.91), specificity 0.34 (0.33–0.35), positive predictive value 0.08 (0.07–0.09), negative predictive value 0.98 (0.98–0.98), positive likelihood ratio (PLR) 1.43 (1.33–1.54), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) 0.40 (0.33–0.50), and area under the curve (AUC) 0.70 (0.62–0.78). Results were similar at days 2 and 90. There was moderate heterogeneity while pooling PLR (p < 0.01, I2 >50%), with stroke specialist TIA diagnosis associated with slightly higher PLR. At 5% baseline stroke risk, ABCD2 >3 indicated an absolute increase in 7-day stroke risk of only 2.0% while a score ≤3 indicated a 2.9% decrease in risk. Changes in risk were very small when baseline stroke risk was lower.
Conclusions: The ABCD2 score leads to only small revisions of baseline stroke risk particularly in settings of very low baseline risk and when used by nonspecialists.
GLOSSARY
- AUC=
- area under the curve;
- IQR=
- interquartile range;
- NLR=
- negative likelihood ratio;
- NPV=
- negative predictive value;
- PLR=
- positive likelihood ratio;
- PPV=
- positive predictive value
.
Footnotes
Editorial, page 958
Supplemental data at www.neurology.org
- Received October 20, 2011.
- Accepted February 29, 2012.
- Copyright © 2012 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
