This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives Hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) causes progressive spasticity and weakness of the lower limbs. As neurologic examination and the clinical Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS) are subject to potential patient-dependent and clinician-dependent bias, instrumented gait analysis bears the potential to objectively quantify impaired gait. The aim of this study was to investigate gait cyclicity parameters by application of a mobile gait analysis system in a cross-sectional cohort of patients with HSP and a longitudinal fast progressing subcohort.
Methods Using wearable sensors attached to the shoes, patients with HSP and controls performed a 4 × 10 m walking test during regular visits in 3 outpatient centers. Patients were also rated according to the SPRS, and in a subset, questionnaires on quality of life and fear of falling were obtained. An unsupervised segmentation algorithm was used to extract stride parameters and respective coefficients of variation.
Results Mobile gait analysis was performed in a total of 112 ambulatory patients with HSP and 112 age-matched and sex-matched controls. Although swing time was unchanged compared with controls, there were significant increases in the duration of the total stride phase and the duration of the stance phase, both regarding absolute values and coefficients of variation values. Although stride parameters did not correlate with age, weight, or height of the patients, there were significant associations of absolute stride parameters with single SPRS items reflecting impaired mobility (|r| > 0.50), with patients' quality of life (|r| > 0.44), and notably with disease duration (|r| > 0.27). Sensor-derived coefficients of variation, on the other hand, were associated with patient-reported fear of falling (|r| > 0.41) and cognitive impairment (|r| > 0.40). In a small 1-year follow-up analysis of patients with complicated HSP and fast progression, the absolute values of mobile gait parameters had significantly worsened compared with baseline.
Discussion The presented wearable sensor system provides parameters of stride characteristics which seem clinically valid to reflect gait impairment in HSP. Owing to the feasibility regarding time, space, and costs, this study forms the basis for larger scale longitudinal and interventional studies in HSP.
Glossary
- 3D=
- 3-dimensional;
- CV=
- coefficient of variation;
- FES-I=
- Falls Efficacy Scale International questionnaire;
- HSP=
- hereditary spastic paraplegia;
- MoCA=
- Montreal Cognitive Assessment;
- SF-12=
- Short Form 12;
- SPRS=
- Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale;
- TUG=
- timed up and go test
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Peter Hedera, MD, PhD.
- Received January 17, 2022.
- Accepted in final form April 19, 2022.
- © 2022 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
