This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives To describe the phenotypic spectrum of dystrophinopathy in a large cohort of individuals with DMD exon 2 duplications (Dup2), who may be particularly amenable to therapies directed at restoring expression of either full-length dystrophin or nearly full-length dystrophin through utilization of the DMD exon 5 internal ribosome entry site (IRES).
Methods In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed data from large genotype–phenotype databases (the United Dystrophinopathy Project [UDP] and the Italian DMD network) and classified participants into Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), intermediate muscular dystrophy (IMD), or Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) phenotypes. Log-rank tests for time-to-event variables were used to compare age at loss of ambulation (LOA) in participants with Dup2 vs controls without Dup2 in the UDP database and for comparisons between steroid-treated vs steroid-naive participants with Dup2.
Results Among 66 participants with Dup2 (UDP = 40, Italy = 26), 61% were classified as DMD, 9% as IMD, and 30% as BMD. Median age at last observation was 15.4 years (interquartile range 8.79–26.0) and 75% had been on corticosteroids for at least 6 months. Age at LOA differed significantly between participants with Dup2 DMD and historical controls without Dup2 DMD (p < 0.001). Valid spirometry was limited but suggested a delay in the typical age-related decline in forced vital capacity and 24 of 55 participants with adequate cardiac data had cardiomyopathy.
Discussion Some patients with Dup2 display a milder disease course than controls without Dup2 DMD, and prolonged ambulation with corticosteroids suggests the potential of IRES activation as a molecular mechanism. As Dup2-targeted therapies reach clinical applications, this information is critical to aid in the interpretation of the efficacy of new treatments.
Glossary
- BMD=
- Becker muscular dystrophy;
- CI=
- confidence interval;
- CS=
- corticosteroids;
- DMD=
- Duchenne muscular dystrophy;
- Dup2=
- duplication of exon 2;
- EF=
- ejection fraction;
- FVC%p=
- forced vital capacity percent predicted;
- HR=
- hazard ratio;
- IMD=
- intermediate muscular dystrophy;
- IMD=
- intermediate muscular dystrophy;
- IQR=
- interquartile range;
- IRES=
- internal ribosomal entry site;
- ITAF=
- IRES transactivation factor;
- LOA=
- loss of ambulation;
- LVEF=
- left ventricular ejection fraction;
- UDP=
- United Dystrophinopathy Project
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
↵* These authors contributed equally as first authors.
↵† These authors contributed equally as last authors.
Italian DMD Network and the United Dystrophinopathy Project coinvestigators are listed at links.lww.com/WNL/B730.
- Received May 12, 2021.
- Accepted in final form December 13, 2021.
- © 2021 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
